The soil under Hamilton’s Central Park, off of Bay Street North, is severely contaminated with various chemicals, including benzene, a carcinogenic substance linked to blood cancers.
Some of the park’s soil must be removed and disposed of as hazardous waste. Much of the removal is already complete.
A clean soil cap is needed to separate users from the contaminated soil, and a groundwater drainage system built to protect neighbouring homes from further contamination.
The park was created in 1981 after the old City of Hamilton expropriated the property from Currie Products in 1979. Currie operated a tar processing plant on the site and often stored toxic chemicals on-site as well.
Residents near the park warned of contamination for decades. Ontario’s Ministry of the Environment became involved in late 2012 after residents reported substances oozing out of the ground in the park.
The Ministry ordered the City of Hamilton to conduct testing, which found chemicals in the soil resulting in further testing.
The testing found serious contamination in the soil of Central Park site with “benzene PHC F2-F3, PAHs (acenaphthylene, benzo[a]anthracene, benzo[a]pyrene, benzo[b]fluoranthene, benzo[ghi]perylene, benzo[k]fluoranthene, chrysene, dibenz[a,h]anthracene, fluoranthene, indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene, 1- and 2-Methylnaphthalene, pyrene), metals (antimony, arsenic, cadmium, copper, lead, zinc)” and “benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, xylones, PHC F1 and F2, styrene, trichloroethylene, and vinyl chloride, PAHs (acenaphthene, acenaphthylene, fluorene, and naphthalene), and mercury” among the contaminants.
“Concentrations of one or more of benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, xylenes, PHC F2, and/or F3 exceeded the selected MECP Table 5 standards in subsurface soil samples,” reads a report on the testing.
The results will not surprise nearby residents who’ve warned about the pollution for decades.
Steve Rudaniecki, who had stage IV chronic lymphocytic leukemia in his 50s and was age 61 in 2013, spoke extensively to local media at the time, sharing how others in his home and nearby houses died of brain cancers.
Rudaniecki lived in his home bordering the Central Park site his entire life.
Speaking to The Hamilton Spectator’s Steve Buist, Rudaniecki stated his mother ‘had had a breast removed because of cancer, and she also had a brain tumour. His stepfather died from a combination of lung and brain cancer.”
He told Buist of people experiencing cancers in neighbouring houses and is quoted stating, “Coincidence? I don’t know” “But seven people and four houses in a row?”
The park’s contamination is detailed in recent environmental assessments commissioned by the Hamilton City Council and released to potential contractors last week.
There have been no public discussions of the contamination at City Council, nor has the City Manager’s Office released the reports in public statements nor media releases.
It is unknown how many closed meetings have been held by City Hall to discuss the reports during the past two years.
Recent testing confirms that “The maximum measured soil vapour benzene concentration of 83 μg/m3 (SVPI 8-04 measured on October 22, 2018) exceeded the residential sub-slab vapour criteria of 25.3 μg/m3 (residential land use Health Based Indoor Air Criteria adjusted with an attenuation factor of 0.02).”
The 2019 and 2021 Environmental Site Assessment reports state the park requires an engineered groundwater mitigation system “to mitigate risks to neighbouring properties through indoor air inhalation from a groundwater source.”
The ESA is not a study of health impacts. No studies have been done regarding the health outcomes and effects for nearby residents.
The Central Park ESA reports became public last week when City Hall shared them with potential bidders for the contract to complete removal of the most contaminated soil, remediation of the ground, installation of groundwater drainage systems to stop underground toxins from continuing to endanger neighbouring residential homes and complete construction of the new Central Park before the municipal election in fall 2022.
The reports confirm the City of Hamilton has known of some contamination for decades.
In 1994, during the construction of a children’s play structure, workers found “just one foot beneath the surface, a foul-smelling, tar substance was discovered over an area of about a square yard,” reads a November 23 Hamilton Spectator article from that year.
The ESA reports cite a 1994 City of Hamilton memo and state at the time, “The City retained Golder Associates Ltd. to collect one sample from the excavation. Laboratory analysis identified exceedances of MECP residential/parkland land-use guidelines for arsenic, total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH), benzene, ethylbenzene, PAHs and oil and grease current at the time of the assessment.”
In addition to the contaminants in the soil, it is suspected that a rail car is buried under the park.
In 2013, responding to Ministry of Environment concerns, the City conducted a ground-penetrating radar search in the northeast portion of the park.
“The findings identified several metallic buried objects, including one that had dimensions comparable to that of a rail car,” reads the 2021 SNC Lavalin report. “No other information was available at the time to confirm the presence of the rail car, or its contents.”
The suspected rail car site is marked 14 in the satellite image map below, and the rectangular shape in the image below that which maps data collected by ground-penetrating radar tests.
Important to Listen to Communities: Environment Hamilton
Lynda Lukasik, Executive Director of Environment Hamilton, has read the latest documents and the Environmental Site Assessment.
“On reviewing the documents, it was shocking to me to learn about the extent of the contamination at the site,” she says. “If I have learned anything, it is that community members who have lived in an area for a long time know the area best, and they are usually right when they raise alarm bells about problems around them. Long-time residents should be listened to.”
Environment Hamilton says the City of Hamilton needs to share more information with the public, especially neighbours to the park.
“Given the issues at this site, there should be detailed information available to the public explaining the issues,” Lukasik says. “It’s not too late for the City of Hamilton to put some energy into being open and transparent about the situation at Central Park and the measures being put in place to resolve the legacy contamination issues there. Given that this is a public space and that the remediation is being paid for by the city, it is not unreasonable for details regarding this work to be shared with the public.”
EH is calling on the City to create a Community Liaison Committee for the remediation process consisting of neighbours, experts, city staff, and contractors.
Groundwater Control and Fill Cap
The City must construct a groundwater recovery trench “with at least two groundwater extraction wells” to stop the flow of contaminated groundwater into neighbouring properties. The system will require permits from the Ministry of the Environment. The provincial Environmental Registry of Ontario does not list a permit being issued yet.
Once all underground work is complete, the City must install a fill cap of at least 1 metre for most of the park, with 1.5 metres required for the most contaminated sections.
The planned community garden will use raised beds with a further separation from the ground soil, and soil will be brought in for the gardens.
The City wants all work completed by June 21, 2022 to reopen the park during the summer of 2022.
The Environment Site Assessment is limited to Central Park and does not assess neighbouring properties. The ESA states they are likely contaminated due to past industrial and waste uses in the neighbourhood.
Bids for the Central Park contract close on November 3, 2021.
During one of my Jane’s Walks we were on Harriet St. discussing the Fenton Brush building. An older woman that lives/d across the street also came out to provide added information. As a child, the children of the neighbourhood would get their to watch the at least weekly fire at the asphalt shingle factory in what is now the park. Of course any time that goes up in flames the water is contaminated. Obviously no attempt had been made to mitigate that water at the time.
Doesn’t surprise me. This city is so polluted it’s unsafe on so many levels. Hamilton is so far back from the average city in terms of development, it will take them 50-100 years to clean it up. That waste of a polluted, stinkhole of a waterfront. The funny thing is, they’re always talking about how green hamilton is? It’s one of the most polutted cities in Canada!! Best bet, get out.
This city covers up every failure that occurs. No remediation until someone exposes the truth. How many more areas or neighbourhoods that are contaminated? We deserve to be called the armpit of Ontario and the city’s council emits the strongest stench.
When so many voters don’t want a tax increase elected officials wanting to get popular vote act accordingly. We need to show we care by voting and since Municipality the number exercising that right is low a huge difference could be made.